This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
“Pleased”, barely describes my reaction to Michael Speaks article “After Theory” in the June Record. An architectural “theory” is woefully outclassed by those in physics or chemistry. But I am mostly concerned that being “cool” and “engaged” will soon become discarded theories in a changing world. Speaks’ views would resonate more forcibly had he ratcheted up his thinking and viewed architecture as a craft, which it is, rather than an art form struggling to find an academic home.
James A. Gresham, FAIA
Tucson, AZ
You have 0 complimentary articles remaining.
Unlimited access + premium benefits for as low as $1.99/month.