I agree with Michael Speaks that design theory is finally and fortunately shedding the negativism and nihilism of Deconstruction and Marxism. His lucid essay “After Theory” in the June issue also celebrates the rise of the “post-critics,” who have rejected “criticality” in favor of engagement with the marketplace and embraced proactive, so-called “projective” practices. After a generation of bingeing on abstract theory, it is time for vanguard architects to start addressing the many problems that face society. The rise of young, innovative “workshop” practices represents a return to architecture as craft, albeit high-tech.
Does this mean the end of theory? I hope not. That would only ensure critical theorists will have their revenge in the next cycle. And there is no way for our sophisticated architectural culture not to be theoretical––at least not since Alberti and Palladio raised our craft to a discipline and discourse on a par with science and the humanities. Our brains will always tend to be ahead of our hands, even though some things are better learned through the encounter with materials and tools. Although some breakthroughs come from the workshop floor, expensive and long-lived works of architecture and urbanism need intelligent and careful thought. Let’s continue to be theoretical, but in a more pragmatic way that addresses environmental, social, and economic problems and opportunities, as well as aesthetic issues.
You have 0 complimentary articles remaining.
Unlimited access + premium benefits for as low as $1.99/month.