This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
For more than three years they have come. Day by day, the faithful gather at the wall, drawn to the place where the unthinkable happened. After the obligatory photograph, they stare down, past the PATH station discharging its human cargo, into the gaping void, wondering what will become of Ground Zero. Little wonder. Even vigilant city dwellers and professionals have lost focus on the development spiral.
For a few short months, particularly in the days surrounding the selection of a master planner, we had hoped for more. Daniel Libeskind mounted the stage with élan, flourishing authoritative rhetoric in words and images, pointing a way out of the 75-foot-deep mire. He had a vision (we could see it; it was near-tactile in the imagery) that rested on bedrock at one extreme and spiraled toward new heights for Lower Manhattan. That plan was founded on architecture.
You have 0 complimentary articles remaining.
Unlimited access + premium benefits for as low as $1.99/month.