This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Predicting the future of the city is a lot like predicting the future of human society. Urban areas embody the physical infrastructure of our cultures and economies, and will house 70 percent of the world's population by 2050. They are too complex for detailed extrapolations, yet we can make insightful observations about their current behavior.
For example, in 1991 Saskia Sassen popularized the term “global city” to indicate a metropolis that is a critical node in the global economy. That definition stuck, but now urbanists, policymakers, and programmers are heralding the new “smart city.” The premise is simple: a smart city integrates hardware and software to improve living and working conditions. However, the broad debate on what “smart” means in practice only proves that the endgame scenario is still unknown.
You have 0 complimentary articles remaining.
Unlimited access + premium benefits for as low as $1.99/month.