This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Architectural Record logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Subscribe
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Architectural Record logo
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Interviews
    • Reviews
    • Commentary
    • Editorials
  • PROJECTS
    • Building Types
    • Interior Design
    • Museums & Arts Centers
    • Adaptive Reuse
    • Colleges & Universities
    • Lighting
    • Snapshot
  • HOUSES
    • Record Houses
    • House of the Month
    • Featured Houses
    • Kitchen and Bath
  • PRODUCTS
    • Material World
    • Categories
    • Award Winners
    • Case Studies
    • Partners in Design
    • Trends & Insights
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Best Architecture Schools
    • Top 300 Firms
    • Theme Issues
    • Record Houses
    • Record Products
    • Good Design Is Good Business
    • Design Vanguard
    • Historical Archive
    • Cocktail Napkin Sketch
    • Videos
  • CALL FOR ENTRIES
    • Record Houses
    • Guess the Architect Contest
    • Submit Your Work
  • CONTINUING ED
    • Architectural Technology
    • Architect Continuing Education
    • Continuing Education Center
    • Digital Academies
  • EVENTS
    • Record on the Road
    • Innovation Conference
    • Women In Architecture
    • Webinars
    • Advertising Excellence Awards
  • MORE
    • Subscribe
    • Customer Service
    • Digital Edition
    • eNewsletter
    • Interactive Spotlight
    • Store
    • Custom Content Marketing
    • Research
    • Sponsor Insights
    • eBooks
  • CONTACT
    • Advertise
Home » Task Force to Clarify Reporting on Hazmats and Alternatives
Architecture News

Task Force to Clarify Reporting on Hazmats and Alternatives

July 16, 2014
Bill Millard
Reprints
No Comments

Architects seeking safe, sustainable materials for their buildings have often had to operate in either an information vacuum or wade through an array of rating systems that can be burdensome and baffling. The complexity of supply chains sometimes means that no one is certain what substances a product contains; in other cases, a known material passes muster with one program while raising red flags with another. Manufacturers, too, struggle with the discrepancies and redundancies of different programs' reporting requirements. Now, with support from the U.S. Green Building Council, four major green-manufacturing organizations are striving to simplify the process of assessing and reporting materials' effects on human and environmental health.

“I think the [architecture and design] community does not have a full understanding of how complicated these supply chains are and the kind of industry transformation that's happening,” says Stacy Glass, vice president for the built environment at the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute (C2CPII), a San Francisco-based nonprofit that implements product and material standards originally envisioned by architect and author William McDonough and chemist Michael Braungart. C2CPII is joining Clean Production Action, the Healthy Building Network, and the Health Product Declaration (HPD) Collaborative on a “Harmonization Task Force” charged with reconciling inconsistencies across programs so that suppliers can report the content of their products more easily and specifiers can understand their toxicities more clearly. “We're making huge progress,” Glass continues, “toward simplifying this path. Everybody's common goal is, we want better, cleaner, healthier materials out there. There's a path to do this, and we want to get manufacturers on the path.”

The Material Health Evaluation Programs Harmonization Opportunities Report, published by the USGBC last year, set out the challenge diving into the details of best practices in ingredient reporting and hazard assessment. Comparing five protocols – C2CPII’s Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard; Clean Production Action’s GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals; the Healthy Building Network’s Pharos Chemical and Material Library and Building Product Library; the HPD Collaborative’s Health Product Declaration; and the International Living Future Institute’s Declare – the report describes multiple areas where they can align standards and cut compliance costs. All five define procedures for content inventory and screening against various “red lists” of hazardous and restricted substances. The programs are interdependent in some areas: HPD and Pharos incorporate the GreenScreen List Translator, for example, automating the time-intensive process of researching a material's hazards. GreenScreen and C2CPII, recognizing that avoiding what Glass calls “the super-bad players” (known carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxins, and endocrine disruptors) is just the low-hanging fruit of environmentally responsible specification, go further into full hazard assessment. The latter program certifies products at five levels across five categories, evaluating material reuse, energy management, water stewardship, and social fairness along with material health.

The goal is to streamline the programs, Glass notes, not merge them. Participants recognize that different benchmarks serve different needs, from basic reporting to full C2CPII certification. Instead, balancing some of the relevant priorities (transparency versus protection of proprietary information, for example, or self-disclosure versus third-party verification), the task force calls for collaboration plus development of a comprehensive hazard database and a one-stop data-entry interface. Development of this tool is “well under way,” she says, “and I think there'll be a rollout of the first phase at Greenbuild [in] mid-October.”

These reporting systems, Glass adds, are unrelated to the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations and lack the force of law (as well as the tendency to attract pushback from industry over interpretations and implications of research, she notes, citing American Chemical Council and Vinyl Institute opposition to LEED v4 over the life-cycle-hazard status of polyvinyl chloride). They reflect an accentuate-the-positive philosophy, a belief that research-based information about both hazardous materials and safer substances with similar performance attributes can drive markets and innovation in ways that simple banned-material lists cannot. “There are things that we know are bad; enough research has been done; and that's where the precautionary principle comes into play,” she says. “There's enough evidence here to say that we should be concerned about them. So let's just find alternatives.”

AR Subscribe

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

More Videos

AR Huber Webinar 12/10


 


 

Events

December 10, 2019

New Options for Insulating and Venting Wood-Framed Sloped Roofs

Credits: 1 AIA LU/HSW; 1 AIBD P-CE; 0.1 IACET CEU

May qualify for learning hours through most Canadian architectural associations

A comprehensive overview of the control layers of a wood-framed sloped roof assembly. New code provisions will be discussed for high-performance, green and sustainable building practices. The differences between vented and unvented assembly requirements will be defined. In conclusion, a review of the emerging 2018 code provisions will be done as well as a comparison of different methods to providing continuous and integrated air, water, and thermal barrier.

December 12, 2019

Improving Building Delivery with BIM

Credits: 1 AIA LU/Elective; 1 AIBD P-CE; 0.1 IACET CEU
May qualify for learning hours through most Canadian architectural associations

BIM brings countless advantages to the construction team, but the biggest benefit lies with the owner. For architects continuing to develop and enhance delivery methods, BIM is the solution. In this webinar with Rob Glisson, AIA, principal at ROJO Architecture, see how BIM can help you reduce risk, accelerate schedules, establish more accurate budgets, decrease costs, and better serve your clients.

View All Submit An Event

Products

ENR Square Foot Costbook 2020

ENR Square Foot Costbook 2020

See More Products

Tweets by @ArchRecord

Architectural Record

AR December 2019 Cover

2019 December

In the December 2019 issue, Architectural Record reveals the winners of the annual Record Products contest.

View More Subscribe
  • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Survey And Sample
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Call for Entries
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe
    • Renew
    • Create Account
    • Change Address
    • Pay My Bill
    • Free eNewsletters
    • Customer Care
  • Advertise
    • Architectural Record
    • Advertising Awards
  • Industry Jobs

Copyright ©2019. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing