When we work on social housing, Elemental delivers the essential parts of a house and the owners add on to what we deliver. This approach to housing has been around since British architect John F.C. Turner’s work in Peru in the late 1950s, so it’s not just our philosophical view. This strategy was a consequence of not having enough financing for projects—on average, only about $7,500 per unit. Most housing costs about $10,000 to $12,000 per unit. We tried to provide only what is difficult for families to acquire: the land, the frame of the house, and a connection to utilities. It was far more important to use our limited funds to build a well-located complex of social housing—close to jobs, to education, to transportation. So incremental housing was our answer.

Was this the approach you took for the Lo Barnechea housing in Santiago?

Yes. We said, “Let’s focus on what families will never be able to achieve on their own and then allow them to complete the house.”

How has that project influenced attitudes toward social housing in that city?

The quality of public housing was always a big question mark in Chile. Quantity was OK—Chile is the only country in the world that has reduced its housing deficits. But we found that the question “What is quality?” needed to be reframed from just being about making bigger units. For us, a quality unit gains value over time. In developing nations, you get a subsidy from the state and you become an owner of your unit. We sought to harness the housing policy not just to create shelter but to use it as a tool to allow residents to take out bank loans, to start small businesses, or pay for a better education for their children. So we reframed “quality” as housing being delivered as an investment and not just as a social advancement. Our plan, based on research we’d conducted, was very well received by society, by the families, and by politicians.

What about the forestry workers’ housing in Constitución? How did Elemental get this commission?

Elemental is the result of a partnership with Santiago’s Catholic University and COPEC, the Chilean oil company. COPEC also owns Arauco, the forest company in the south of Chile in the city of Constitución. After the 8.8-magnitude earthquake in 2010, the company asked us to try and create new housing for its workers with the Elemental approach, seeing as they’re already applying for state subsidies. And we plan to build about 9,000 units for its workers. We’ll also be redesigning the entire city of Constitución, and donating to the government our studies and documents required for a coordinated, efficient reconstruction. So what we’re building in the south now is part of the process of reconstruction—they’ll be the first things built.

Not every firm is able to partner with major energy corporations or universities. What role can architects play in addressing the world’s growing need for housing?

If there’s any power in architecture or in design, it’s the power of synthesis. When you face complex issues, such as reconstruction following an earthquake, you have to think about schools, institutional buildings, housing, energy, and sewage. And that requires a level of coordination that is quite hard to achieve. Architects can offer design as a powerful tool in order to tackle more dimensions of a problem simultaneously, while keeping the problem simple enough to solve.

So what’s next for Elemental? What do you have on your agenda?

We spend one-third of our time on social housing, a third on this new city, and a third doing private architecture. We’re also currently working on projects for Novartis and Catholic University, among others.