Newsmakers: Kevin Roche and Morrison Heckscher
The original Charles Engelhard Court, designed by Kevin Roche as part of his 1970 master plan for the completion of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s building in New York City, opened in 1980. It was conceived as a multilevel garden atrium connecting the 1924 American Wing to the rest of the museum. Furnished with planters, wooden benches, brick pavers, and trellises, it was not intended as an exhibition area. As the Met’s collection of American art grew, however, it came to be used as a sculpture gallery.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The new Engelhard Court, seen here in the process of installation, has lost vegetation but gained a 6,000-square-foot Jerusalem limestone floor to set off the museum’s prized collection of American sculpture. A 3,000-square-foot mezzanine has been added below the balcony facing Central Park to exhibit decorative arts, including a major collection of art pottery recently donated to the museum. The new level has glass railings, which have also replaced former concrete parapets on the east and west balconies, so that objects shown in transparent vitrines can be seen from below, and outdoor views serve as a foil for works, such as stained-glass windows, displayed against the glass curtain wall.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The new mezzanine level, which forms a discrete gallery suspended above the courtyard, was built using concrete flat-slab construction to keep it as thin and unobtrusive as possible. The café situated on the west side of the court is now located beneath the mezzanine, which furnishes LED overhead lighting. Ground-level windows facing the park have been temporarily obscured because of ongoing construction outside.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Although the court no longer features a garden with movable benches, parapets built into the architecture, as around the fountain shown here, provide more seating than before. Relief sculptures that had been hung at the top of the south wall are now at ground level, replaced by stained-glass windows more appropriately displayed on the wall above. Visitors can get close to and walk around objects that were formerly embedded in planters or hidden behind trellises.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
American Classical sculptures of the 19th century are framed by the marble facade of the former 1824 U.S. Branch Bank that has fronted the American Wing since it opened in 1924. The bank door, which leads into the ground-floor decorative-arts and period-room galleries, was meant to serve as the main entrance to the entire wing, but since 1980 the public has routinely used an alternative entrance at the right to get to the upper floors. That entryway, newly expanded, now frames a modern elevator provided to facilitate access.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The Jerusalem limestone the Met staff chose for the new courtyard floor has a yellow tone that matches the bank facade’s Westchester County marble, which contains iron ore that has caused it to yellow. The facade is now better integrated into the courtyard, which offers a uniform backdrop for displaying art.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
The period rooms on each of the three floors of the original American Wing are displayed around a central gallery containing related artwork. The ceiling of the top-floor gallery, among the earliest installations in the wing, was reproduced from a 17th-century meetinghouse still standing in Hingham, Massachusetts. Like other parts of the core building, the gallery has been redesigned, and the rooms surrounding it have been rearranged for clearer wayfinding and a better chronological progression.
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
New technology has been used in the refurbished period rooms to increase both the sense and the knowledge of history—sometimes to contradictory effect. Fiber-optic lighting has been subtly employed to illuminate the rooms, thereby enhancing the impression of historic authenticity, while interactive computer terminals have been mounted on the banisters facing the displays, providing information about the objects on view. Although the computers are a rich educational resource for visitors, they interrupt the direct immersion in the environment encouraged by the soft ambient lighting. Will they, as the Met hopes, draw contemporary audiences into an appreciation of the real thing?
Photo © The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Nearly two decades ago, the Metropolitan Museum of Art completed the 1970 master plan by Kevin Roche, FAIA, of Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates (KRJDA), for its building in New York City’s Central Park. Since then, the museum may not expand up or out on its site. Yet it continues to reconfigure interior spaces to accommodate changing curatorial needs and increased attendance. The latest installment in this ongoing process, the second phase of a three-part renovation of the museum’s American Wing, was unveiled on May 18 in a ribbon-cutting ceremony presided over by First Lady Michelle Obama
This stage of the project—by Roche, with the assistance of Garry Leonard, AIA, a senior design associate at KRJDA, and managing partner James P. Owens, Jr., AIA, in close collaboration with the Met’s curatorial staff—focused on the wing’s historic period rooms and glass-enclosed Charles Engelhard Court. It has transformed the erstwhile garden atrium into an exhibition hall by removing planters and replacing a formerly sunken, mason granite floor with a level Jerusalem limestone surface for the installation of sculpture. A new mezzanine was added under the balcony on the Central Park side of the court to display decorative arts, and the ground beneath it was excavated to provide 9,500 square feet of much-needed service space. The period rooms, which span the 17th through the early 20th century, were revised and reorganized for better chronological order and a clearer historical narrative.
When it opened in 1924, the American Wing—designed by architect Grosvenor Atterbury—was a freestanding, three-story structure to the northwest of the Met’s main building. Set behind the facade of Martin E. Thompson’s 1824 U.S. Branch Bank, which was acquired by the museum in 1915 when the former Wall Street building was razed, the wing was created to show American decorative arts and design, and featured a group of period rooms that would grow to become the most comprehensive collection of its kind in the world. In 1980, Roche expanded the wing according to his master plan to include painting and sculpture, and incorporated it into the main body of the museum with the addition of the Engelhard Court. At that time, a number of structural problems became evident that haunt the building to this day, chief among them the fact that its floor levels are out of sync with the rest of the museum.
Before the opening of the refurbished galleries, I spoke with Roche and Morrison H. Heckscher, chairman of the American Wing, about some of the challenges, as well as the history and achievements, of this project, and the delicate balance between architecture and art that such a program entails.
Leslie Yudell: Could you talk about the controversy that surrounded the expansion of the American Wing into Central Park in 1980?
Morrison Heckscher: At that time, the principal goal was to get the building built. The project was very political; it involved major negotiation having to do with building in the park. The design went forward regardless of the merits.
Kevin Roche: We had a hard time getting the master plan approved because the community said we were encroaching on Central Park, but we were not. The museum had been deeded a large area of the park, to the north, south, and west, that was never built up. Actually, we didn’t build out to the deeded area; we occupied less than the allotted space and gave back territory. The real issue for the community was they didn’t want the museum to expand at all.
LY: When the Engelhard Court finally opened in 1980, it was praised for its lush garden interior, and it remained popular. Why did you redesign it?
MH: The environment for plants is different than that for art, and after 30 years of experience with the building, we concluded that we could not maintain the space as a greenhouse. This is an art museum: It’s more important to have the collections displayed properly. Sculpture and stained glass especially were not shown to best effect.
KR: The Engelhard Court was never envisioned to have sculpture; it was intended as a garden courtyard. The design goes back to the original concept for the master plan, which introduced a series of relaxing places in the museum where people could rest, which would serve as entry points to different collections. The idea was borrowed from the courtyard of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston [by Willard T. Sears, 1901]. But as the sculpture collection grew, and pieces were moved from other areas into the court, I said: If this is an exhibition space, why not take out the plantings, level the floor, and make it a sculpture gallery.
Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!
