This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies
By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn More
This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Architectural Record
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
Architectural Record
  • NEWS
    • Latest News
    • Coronavirus Coverage
    • Technology
    • Interviews
    • Commentary
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
  • PROJECTS
    • Building Types
    • Adaptive Reuse
    • Museums & Arts Centers
    • Colleges & Universities
    • Interior Design
    • Lighting
    • Kitchen & Bath
  • HOUSES
    • Record Houses
    • House of the Month
    • Featured Houses
  • PRODUCTS
    • Material World Newsletter
    • Categories
    • Products of the Year
    • Sponsored Products
  • EXCLUSIVES
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
      • Design:ED Podcast
      • Sponsored Podcasts
    • Historic Archive
    • Record Houses
    • Design Vanguard
    • Record Interiors
    • Top 300 Firms
    • Products of the Year
    • Best Architecture Schools
  • SUBMIT WORK
    • Design Vanguard 2021
    • Record Houses 2021
    • Guess the Architect
    • Cocktail Napkin Sketch
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Editorial Calendar
  • CONTINUING ED
    • Editorial Continuing Ed
    • CE Center
    • CE Topic Academies
  • EVENTS
    • Record on the Road
    • Innovation Conference
    • Women In Architecture
    • Webinars
    • Ad Excellence Awards
    • Submit an Event
  • MORE
    • CONTACT
      • Masthead
      • Customer Service
      • Subscribe
      • Custom Content Marketing
    • Advertise
    • Newsletters
    • Store
    • Custom Content Marketing
    • Research
    • Sponsor Insights
    • Sponsored eBooks
  • MAGAZINE
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • Historic Archive
    • Subscribe
    • Customer Service
    • My Account
  • Sign In
  • Subscribe
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Home » 2008 Top 250 Architecture Firms

2008 Top 250 Architecture Firms

HOW TO USE THIS TABLE

Companies are ranked by revenue (in millions of dollars) for architectural services performed in 2007. These data also appear in Engineering News-Record’s Top 500 Design Firms list, which, unlike our ranking, also includes firms that do engineering exclusively.

To participate in next year’s survey, contact Gary Tulacz at tulaczg@bnpmedia.com. 

Key to how firms classify themselves:

A = Architect
AE = Architect-Engineer
AP = Architect Planner
EAL = Engineer Architect Landscape
AEC = Architect-Engineer-Contractor
(not all combinations listed)

TOP 250 ARCHITECTURE FIRMS

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201- 250

ARCHITECTURE FIRMS RANKED ACCORDING TO 2007 REVENUE
Rank Company U.S. Location Type of Firm Total Architectural Revenue Domestic Architectural Revenue International Architectural Revenue Percent of Design Revenue from Architecture Total Design Revenue
51 JCJ Architecture Hartford, Conn. A 53.20 51.90 1.30 100% 53.20
52 OWP/P Chicago, Ill. AE 52.90 49.60 3.30 100% 52.90
53 PBK Architects Houston, Texas AE 52.70 52.70 0.00 100% 52.70
54 KlingStubbins Philadelphia, Pa. AEP 52.00 49.50 2.50 50% 104.00
55 EwingCole Philadelphia, Pa. AE 51.10 49.00 2.10 60% 85.10
56 LS3P Associates Ltd. Charleston, S.C. A 50.35 50.35 0.00 100% 50.35
57 CUH2A Princeton, N.J. AE 50.12 44.85 5.27 62% 80.02
58 Ware Malcomb Irvine, Calif. A 49.80 49.25 0.55 100% 49.80
59 McLarand Vasquez Emsiek & Partners Irvine, Calif. A 49.50 48.50 1.00 100% 49.50
60 Morris Architects Houston, Texas A 48.76 47.72 1.04 100% 48.76
61 Vanderweil Engineers Boston, Mass. E 47.58 38.13 9.45 70% 67.96
62 VOA Associates Inc. Chicago, Ill. A 47.56 46.00 1.56 100% 47.60
63 Elkus Manfredi Architects Boston, Mass. A 47.00 47.00 0.00 100% 47.00
64 Steelman Partners Las Vegas, Nev. A 47.00 39.00 8.00 80% 59.00
65 Perkowitz + Ruth Architects Long Beach, Calif. A 46.24 46.24 0.00 95% 48.83
66 The Shaw Group Inc. Baton Rouge, La. EC 45.80 0.00 45.80 2% 2443.00
67 CBT/Childs Bertman Tseckares Inc. Boston, Mass. A 45.50 43.37 2.13 100% 45.50
68 Kaplan McLaughlin Diaz San Francisco, Calif. A 45.00 36.00 9.00 75% 60.00
69 Dewberry Fairfax, Va. EA 44.18 44.18 0.00 14% 306.19
70 Nadel Inc. Los Angeles, Calif. A 44.00 43.00 1.00 100% 44.00
71 Fentress Architects Denver, Colo. A 43.41 41.71 1.70 100% 43.41
72 HLW International LLP New York, N.Y. EA 43.30 39.00 4.30 100% 43.30
73 Niles Bolton Associates Inc. Atlanta, Ga. A 41.82 41.07 0.75 100% 41.82
74 Aguirre Corp. Dallas, Texas AE 41.00 41.00 0.00 47% 87.00
75 Payette Boston, Mass. A 40.22 35.87 4.35 100% 40.22
76 MBH Architects Alameda, Calif. A 39.20 39.20 0.00 100% 39.20
77 WHR Architects Inc. Houston, Texas A 38.23 38.23 0.00 100% 38.23
78 SB Architects San Francisco, Calif. A 38.10 21.50 16.60 100% 38.10
79 Marnell Corrao Assoc. Las Vegas, Nev. A 38.03 38.03 0.00 100% 38.03
80 Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners LLP New York, N.Y. A 37.93 36.46 1.47 100% 37.93
81 Otak Inc. Lake Oswego, Ore. EA 37.80 34.80 3.00 67% 56.80
82 Solomon Cordwell Buenz Chicago, Ill. A 37.40 37.30 0.10 100% 37.40
83 Polshek Partnership Architects LLP New York, N.Y. A 37.38 37.38 0.00 100% 37.38
84 The Preston Partnership Atlanta, Ga. EA 37.01 37.01 0.00 64% 57.97
85 Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott Boston, Mass. A 35.75 35.25 0.50 100% 35.75
86 Tsoi/Kobus & Associates Inc. Cambridge, Mass. A 35.70 35.70 0.00 100% 35.70
87 Little Diversified Architectural Consultants Charlotte, N.C. AE 35.60 35.25 0.35 61% 58.10
88 Burns & McDonnell Kansas City, Mo. EAC 35.00 30.00 5.00 7% 491.00
89 The Jerde Partnership Venice, Calif. A 35.00 7.00 28.00 100% 35.00
90 Gould Evans Kansas City, Mo. A 34.42 34.42 0.00 96% 36.01
91 WDG Architecture Washington, D.C. A 34.20 33.80 0.40 100% 34.20
92 Opus Group Minnetonka, Minn. AE 33.80 33.70 0.10 67% 50.10
93 The S/L/A/M Collaborative Glastonbury, Conn. AE 33.74 33.74 0.00 100% 33.74
94 The Benham Cos. LLC Oklahoma City, Okla. AEC 33.60 32.00 1.60 30% 111.80
95 Michael Baker Corp. Moon Twp., Pa. EA 33.30 27.50 5.80 9% 354.00
96 Davis Brody Bond Aedas New York, N.Y. A 33.20 31.90 1.30 100% 33.20
97 RNL Denver, Colo. AE 33.06 24.90 8.16 82% 40.10
98 NAC|Architecture Seattle, Wash. AE 32.60 32.60 0.00 100% 32.60
99 Pei Cobb Freed & Partners Architects LLP New York, N.Y. A 32.39 29.44 2.95 100% 32.39
100 Studios Architecture San Francisco, Calif. A 32.38 31.80 0.58 100% 32.38
TOP 250 ARCHITECTURE FIRMS

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201- 250

EARLIER EDITIONS OF THE TOP FIRMS LIST

2007

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the Architectural Record audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep.

Close
Cultured stone biophilic design 01
Sponsored By
Cultured Stone

A Timeless Imperative: Maximizing Biophilic Design

Biophilic design involves the integration of natural and nature-inspired materials in residential and commercial spaces, resulting in proven benefits for mental, emotional, and social wellbeing.
DESIGN:ED Podcast
Listen to Architectural Record’s DESIGN:ED Podcast

Tweets by @ArchRecord

Events

March 24, 2021

Patient Spaces and Privacy

Credits: 1 AIA LU/HSW; 1 AIBD P-CE; 0.1 IACET CEU
May qualify for learning hours through most Canadian architectural associations

Is the tipping point finally here on ditching cubicle curtains? For at least the past decade, healthcare designers and facility managers have been predicting the demise of privacy curtains in hospital and clinical spaces. Many point to the rise of single-patient rooms which afford their own privacy. 

April 7, 2021

Vitruvian Principles Applied to Firm Management: Commodity, Firmness and Delight of Project Accounting

Credits: 1 AIA LU/Elective; 1 AIBD P-CE; 0.1 IACET CEU
May qualify for learning hours through most Canadian architectural associations

This session will show you the remarkable benefits your firm will experience by implementing a system that enables project accounting. While these tools begin by helping you identify project profitability, the benefits ripple outwards. Not only will you be able to identify where your firm makes - and loses - money, but you will learn which employees, partners, project managers, project types and activities generate the most profit.

View All Submit An Event
Patient Spaces and Privacy - Free Inpro Webinar - March 24, 2021 - 2:00 PM EDT

The latest news and information

#1 Source for Architectural Design, News and Products

JOIN RECORD PREMIUM
  • Contact
    • Survey And Sample
    • Editorial Calendar
    • Industry Jobs
  • Call for Entries
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe
    • Renew
    • Create Account
    • Change Address
    • Pay My Bill
    • Free eNewsletters
    • Customer Care
  • Advertise
    • Architectural Record
    • Advertising Awards
  • Privacy
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2021. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing